RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05115
COUNSEL: NONE
BRIAN A. MCMILLEN HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect his enlistment pay grade as
E-6 instead of E-4.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Air Force Reserve recruiter made a mistake in determining
his enlistment grade. He previously held the pay grade of E-
6 and believes that he should have enlisted as an E-6.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty; DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces
of the United States; NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and
Record of Service; birth certificate, orders and various other
documents associated with his request.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Special Order 149-058, dated 29 May 2001, the
applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 effective 1 June
2001.
According to NGB Form 337, Oath of Office, on 11 August 2001,
the applicant was administered the Oath of Office and appointed
as a second lieutenant in the Army National Guard.
According to Special Order 170-003, dated 19 June 1003, the
applicant was honorably separated from the Army National Guard
effective 30 June 2003.
According to DD Form 4, on 31 May 2013, the applicant enlisted
in the Air Force Reserve in the pay grade of E-4 for a period of
four years.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/RSOO recommends approval. A review of the applicants
records reflect that he was promoted to the advanced grade of E-
6 as a prerequisite for attending Officer Candidate School. In
accordance with AFRCI 36-2001, Air Force Reserve Recruiting
Procedures, If an applicant last served as an officer or
warrant officer (Regular or Reserve), then the enlistment grade
authorized is any previously held enlistment grade E-5 or higher
(serving in an enlisted pay grade as a prerequisite to
commissioning satisfies the requirement for prior service
enlisted status).
The complete RSOO evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 17 January 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office (Exhibit C).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
relief. Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree
with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis
for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of
either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the
applicant's records be corrected as set forth below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 31 May
2013, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in the pay grade of
E-6 for a period of four years.
?
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 18 September 2014, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen I. Ferguson, Member
Ms. Jessica L. Spencer-Galucci, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013-
05115:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 October 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/RSOO Advisory, dated 3 January 2014.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 January 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02087
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. Current AFR enlistment incentive information is available in AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives. According to the AFRC Master Incentive Bonus List dated October 2011 - September 2012 effective at the time of the applicants enlistment (15 February 2013), AFSC 2A554B was not on the Master Incentive List for an enlistment bonus. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an enlistment bonus for her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC)/7-skill level and she be awarded the rank of airman first class. The applicant initialed and signed the DD Form 1966 continuation sheet that states both Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills and Enlisting with Stripes for: sections were...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01558
The Military Personnel Database (MilPDS) indicates the applicant is a member of the Air Force Reserve currently serving in the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank of 15 Dec 2005. RSOO notes she was processed as a Prior Service applicant, active duty Air Force from 15 September 1987 to 16 May 1988, rank at time of separation, E-2, Re Code: 3A, SPN/SPN: MDF, Character of Service: Honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 June 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01952
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Neither does the record reveal nor has the applicant provided any evidence indicating that his pay grade was E-4 at the time of his enlistment in the Air Force Reserve on 7 April 2007. While Army records provided by the applicant indicate he was eligible for promotion to specialist (E-4) effective 13 December 2006; his DD Form 214, which is used as...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02588
The evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPZ indicates that if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the record should be corrected to show the applicant’s DOR to airman as 31 May 2001 (his initial date of enlistment into the Air Force Reserve). The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 September 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04420
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Available documentation indicates that the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 30 Jun 99 in the grade of E-1 for a period of six years. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-01075 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03807
On 13 Sep 08, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves in the grade of airman basic (E-1). Prior service pay grade determination is based on AFRCI 36-2001, Chapter 6, Table 6.2, rule 2…when applicant last served in enlisted status with any U.S. Armed Forces, grade awarded will be “permanent enlisted grade held at time of latest discharge.” The complete A1K evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00346
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00346 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her grade be adjusted based on the provisions under the Stripes for Education program. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04741
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04741 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he enlisted in the grade of airman first class (E-3), instead of airman basic (E-1). Under the provisions of AFRCI 36-2001, Air Force Reserve Recruiting Procedures, Table 5.1, Note 5: Documents presented after...